It’s hard to respond to such vague criticism. Do you have one specific item in which I lied or in which what I was saying was deluded? One of my key points is that the policy of non-recognition is not working. If you think it is, I‘d have to say you are the one who is deluded.
As for Chomsky, really? The old fool once had a plausible theory of linguistics, but it has been taking some hits lately.
He’s made a career predicting disasters that never happen and attacking Israel for surviving and prospering when he said it would be swept away fifty years ago. He’s a provably poor prognosticator of event in the Mid-East.
You’re completely wrong on every point you didn’t make. I suggest reading the Bible and War and Peace.