This underscores their testimony as attacking Trump for policy differences, for differences in emphasis and approach in fighting corruption, and for slights to State Department protocol. All of it not exactly riveting and none of it rising to the level of an impeachable act. What’s interesting is what’s not mentioned in this article. Where is the part about Kent admitting concern about the perceived conflict of interest in Biden’s explicit threat to cut-off US aid unless a Prosecutor was fired? That validated Trump’s suggestion that the Ukraine investigate the Bidens. Where is the reporting that Obsma Administration never sent lethal weapons as aid, but Trump did?