What legal experts are you referring to? Names or links would be nice. Why are you so resistant to the fact that Mueller declared there was insufficient evidence to charge anyone in the Trump campaign with collusion-related crimes?
After the most extensive investigation in history the conclusion you seem unable to accept is: no evidence of collusion. Your theory is the most thoroughly and officially debunked conspiracy theory of all time, but you still want to live in your pretend-world of false accusations. Go argue with Mueller. This is what he wrote:
Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.
Translation: No indictments for collusion. Get it? So why do you keep saying all these indictments are waiting? Wishful thinking? Do you have any real source? Any actual legal expert? I thought not.