You are overstating your case. You can’t prove the election was fair. For example, how can you show the system that sent out over a million live ballots to dead people was secure enough to ensure none of them voted. You weren’t there when the ballots carted in by harvesters were actually marked and signed and you don’t really know how many were tossed in the garbage if they were marked for the wrong candidate. The inability to prove fraud in court doesn’t prove the election was fair. Hawley is smart not to claim fraud that he does not have evidence to prove. We do need a thorough investigation of the election. To put it another way, “not guilty” does not prove innocence.