You started off saying “ there is zero evidence….Zero”. After I’ve called that willful blindness, you grant there is evidence, but it is “purported” evidence. My main point in responding was to get you to accept that your original argument was overstated. The evidence that the planes were hijacked by Al Qaeda-led terrorists is not zero. It is too voluminous, too detailed, and too compelling for me to reject. However, there are many specific question marks about the evidence and holes in the official 911 story. I certainly don’t claim to be able to explain it all and I realize the facts I think I know don’t completely add up. Reasonable people can disagree.